Remote patient monitoring trends
Shutterstock

Remote patient monitoring (RPM), which involves using mobile devices to check on patients’ vital signs while at home, as well as in-person or virtual visits from medical professionals, has seen a rise in adoption.

The market value of remote patient monitoring devices in 2021 was US$1.45 billion and is now expected to reach US$4.07 billion by 2030 at an 8.74 per cent CAGR.

Remote patient monitoring benefits for home health

RPM can significantly advance the possibilities of home healthcare. Home care agencies can monitor what is happening in the home with the help of the remote patient management application. This allows them to use their resources more effectively and focus on the patients who genuinely require care on a particular day, but it can also save costs.

RPM technology allows caregivers to keep an eye on patients from remote locations, which improves the time spent on the patient/clinician connection.

The decrease in unnecessary visits to a hospital or clinic is another advantage of this improvement in patient-clinician communication. Visits only occur when necessary because contact between patients and caregivers is already constant and effective.


Future trends

When patients attend a healthcare centre, their primary goals are to recover and return home. The pandemic provided a catalyst to reimagine the future of Care at Home services, notably in the US.

Based on a survey of physicians who primarily serve Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (M.A.) patients, up to US$265 billion in care services (representing up to 25 per cent of the total cost of care) for Medicare FFS and M.A. beneficiaries can be moved to the home by 2025 without reducing quality or access. In addition, Care at Home might benefit payers, medical facilities, physician organisations, Care at Home suppliers, I.T. firms, and investors. It may also enhance the standard of care for patients.

Factors affecting the adoption of remote patient monitoring

A number of variables may influence how quickly services increase care at home. Stakeholders must assess which services can be provided at the patient’s home to address their physical, behavioural, and social needs effectively. Care-at-home providers, tech firms, and investors could contribute by fostering innovation.

Second, the economic sustainability of Care at Home may affect uptake. Because of the possibilities for lower (or non-existent) payment for care if offered at home instead of in a more expensive venue, several healthcare facilities and physician groups have been less motivated to seek Care at Home for their patients. Adoption can be boosted by new payment innovations or reimbursement policies (such as telehealth payment parity or value-based payment plans).

Third, medical knowledge, views, and skills might have a role. Doctors might study case studies and outcomes of how high-quality care can be provided at home, learn about the prospects of care at home, and get instructions on how to carry out the interventions. To raise awareness and give clinicians training and education, payers may have a significant impact.

The final consideration is how patients feel about Care at Home. Patients can be informed of their home care alternatives and express a preference for that type of treatment versus facility-based care. Payers could fund particular services to encourage uptake, and clinicians could advocate Care at Home to patients when clinically appropriate.

How to accelerate growth

Payers, healthcare facilities, and physician organisations, as well as Care at Home providers, technology companies, and investors, could consider a variety of potential activities to help stimulate the adoption of Care at Home services:

Payers


Healthcare facilities and physician groups

Care at-home providers, technology companies, and investors

______

This article appears in Omnia Health magazine. Read the full issue online today.
Back to Technology

About the Author